The Hindu : Opinion / Letters to the Editor : On contempt

Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Thursday, Jan 25, 2007
ePaper

Opinion

Opinion - Letters to the Editor

On contempt

This refers to the article "Contempt of court: need for a second look" (Jan. 22). I agree with Justice Markandey Katju that in a democracy the people should have the right to criticise the judges. But is the average Indian capable of doing that, especially when the verdict is seemingly against him, his caste, community or religion?

Lack of education, awareness, and understanding may hamper a majority from supervising the functioning of courts impartially, leading to unnecessary reproach disgracing the courts. This can ultimately intimidate the judiciary from arriving at fair decisions. While a review of the contempt power is a step in the right direction, its extent should be prudently decided.

Dhawal H. Deota,
Gandhinagar, Gujarat

* * *

Justice should not only be done, but should also manifestly be seen to be done. In the administration of the justice delivery system, it is important to enforce the orders passed by courts.

There are recalcitrant authorities that avoid and evade implementation of judgments, distorting their spirit. In such situations, an instrument such as the Contempt of Courts Act is absolutely necessary for meeting the ends of justice.

Nanjil S. Vargheese,
Chennai

* * *

In the present political climate, the judiciary is the only hope for democracy. We can cite many instances of flagrant violation of various judicial pronouncements. It would, therefore, not be wise to do away with contempt jurisdiction. We must think of a safer course.

G. Thirumalai,
Chennai

* * *

Ordinary citizens see the judiciary as the conscience keeper of our democracy. The path-breaking verdict on the Ninth Schedule has bolstered public confidence in it. But are we not investing too much of power and authority in one organ of democracy? To err is human and judges are human too. Should not their actions be subject to positive criticism? The author is right in pointing out that any criticism that does not hinder the functioning of the judiciary should not be considered contempt of court.

Bankim Samaddar,
Faridabad

* * *

The basic principle of democracy is that all authorities are servants of the people. But the authorities consider themselves masters. And this is the main cause for all the problems in our country.

R.N. Agarwal,
Bikaner

Printer friendly page
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Opinion