Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Tuesday, Feb 06, 2007
ePaper
Google



Tamil Nadu

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

Tamil Nadu Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Dharmapuri bus burning case verdict on February 15

R. Ilangovan

It comes six years after the incident


  • Miscreants torched the college bus following the conviction of AIADMK leader Jayalalithaa
  • High Court suspended trial at Krishnagiri court and transferred case to Salem Sessions court

    SALEM: J udgment in the Dharmapuri bus burning case, which has been on trial at the First Additional District Sessions Court here since March 21, 2005, will be delivered on February 15, six years after the incident.

    Judge D. Krishnaraja heard the final arguments on Monday.

    All 30 of the 31 accused, (one died during the trial), were present. Three girl students of Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU) were burnt alive on February 2, 2000, when miscreants torched their college bus near Ilakkiampatti in Dharmapuri following the conviction of AIADMK leader Jayalalithaa in the Kodaikanal Pleasant Stay Hotel case.

    The case assumed significance when the Madras High Court suspended its trial at the Krishnagiri court and transferred it to the Salem Sessions court on September 19, 2003. Justice V. Kanagaraj, while passing orders on the petition filed by N.P. Veerasamy, father of Kokilavani, one of the victims, seeking transfer of the case from the Krishnagiri court, had described the trial there as "colossal failure and eyewash."

    All the witnesses had turned hostile, which he said, was "disgraceful." He appointed R. Srinivasan as the Special Public Prosecutor and ordered fresh proceedings.

    The then government took nearly 15 months to issue the gazette notification on the SPP's appointment, virtually rendering the trial court in Salem non-functional.

    The High Court had to intervene to make the government notify his appointment. When the trial started, it was further delayed due to non-availability of documents from the Krishnagiri court.

    The case examined 123 prosecution witnesses and two court witnesses, including the then Vice-Chancellor of TNAU and the Dharmapuri Collector.

    Printer friendly page  
    Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



    Tamil Nadu

    News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
    Advts:
    Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |

  • Bharat Matrimony



    News Update


    The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
    Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

    Copyright © 2007, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu