Tamil Nadu - Coimbatore   

"Contradictions" in blasts case records

Principal Correspondent

COIMBATORE: The defence counsel in the Coimbatore serial blasts case on Thursday said that inherent contradictions in the case records were going against the case of the prosecution in respect of a blast at a shopping complex at Sundarapuram on February 14, 1998.

Defence counsel R. Gopalan placed his arguments before the Judge of the Special Court for Bomb Blast Cases; K. Uthirapathy.

T. Balasundaram and T.A. Selvaraj represented the prosecution. More than 50 persons were killed and over 250 were injured in the serial blasts.

Photo mismatch

Photographs taken at the scene of occurrence and the rough sketch prepared by the investigating officer were not corresponding with each other.

Materials found in the photographs were not found in the rough sketch prepared by the police officer.

The photographs taken by the police photographer at the scene of blast were not produced before the court.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Stories in this Section

Singapore: a new education destination for higher studies
Consumer body plea on cinema ticket rates
Corporation plans a lakh new water connections
Say it with a sapling
"Contradictions" in blasts case records
Proposal to regulate call taxis
CODISSIA to organise subcontracting fair
Workshop on coconut development
In Coimbatore Today

Copyright © 2007, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu