Opinion - Letters to the Editor   

The helmet rule

This refers to the article "Enforcing helmet laws — the road ahead" (Feb. 18). Everybody agrees that wearing crash helmets is safe. But the reluctance of some two-wheeler riders to wear a helmet does not have to do with helmets per se. It is the implementation of the rule by the traffic police that is the problem. The police show more interest in cracking down on those riding without helmets than in regulating traffic.

As it is, the traffic police are overburdened. They are yet to rein in those who talk on mobile phones while driving, drive without licence, indulge in rash driving, and so on. Riders without helmets will accelerate on seeing the police and cause injuries to themselves and other road users. In view of all this, I think the people should be given the option to wear helmets. They can be educated on the need to use them.

N.R. Babu,
Hyderabad

While implementing the rule, care should be taken to ensure that only ISO-standardised helmets fulfilling safety norms are sold and the helmet is worn by the pillion rider too.

T.S. Ravi Kumar,
Karakonam

Senior citizens avoid travelling by buses because of the crowd and the risk of being targeted by pickpockets. They find it safer to ride light two-wheelers. Forcing them to carry a burden on their heads in the form of helmets will amount to torturing them. Would it not be wiser to leave it to the discretion of the riders to wear or not to wear helmets?

R. Chandrasekaran,
Chennai

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Stories in this Section

Tax buoyancy and fiscal challenges
China and African economies
Selling the tiger to save it: will it work?
Positives from the peace process
Corrections and Clarifications
Act of cowardice
Mischievous
The helmet rule

Copyright © 2007, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu