The Hindu : Sport : Australians could get whacked in a bar, says Gavaskar

Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Wednesday, Mar 14, 2007
ePaper

Sport

Sport

Australians could get whacked in a bar, says Gavaskar

New Delhi: In a scathing reaction to Ricky Ponting's attack on him, a combative Sunil Gavaskar struck back with vengeance, saying a "hot-headed guy" might actually whack the Australian cricketers if they dared replicate their on-field behaviour in a bar.

The former India captain justified describing the Australian team's behaviour as "awful" and said it would be difficult for players, who use such language, to get away from a bar without being physically hurt.

"Some day, some other hot head guy might actually get down and you know whack somebody who abuses him," Gavaskar said.

Citing the example of former Aussie cricketer David Hookes, who had been fatally beaten up outside a bar, Gavaskar said the behaviour of current players could land them in trouble.

"There's the example of the late David Hookes. Would the Australians who use that kind of language on the field, and not all of them do, in a bar and would they get away with it?

"Would they have a fist coming at their face or not?" Gavaskar said on sports channel ESPN's breakfast show `Taking Guard.'

Defends walk-out

Sunil Gavaskar. — Photo: P.V. Sivakumar

Defending his decision to walk out of the Melbourne Cricket Ground in protest against an lbw decision in 1981, Gavaskar said, "the reason the walk off took place was simply because I was abused by the Australians."

Gavaskar said it was the on-field behaviour of a side which mattered the most in cricket.

"Let me also come back to what he (Ponting) said about, the way I played my cricket and I do not know what he's looking at.

"When he talks about the Indian team not having won matches, we are not talking about winning matches here, we are talking about behaviour on the field," he said. Gavaskar drew a comparison between the Australians and the West Indies side of the 70s and 80s, saying the Caribbeans were popular when they were at the peak.

"The West Indians were popular winners, there was an affection about the West Indians players in spite of the fact that they were beating you in three days."

"They (West Indies) did not abuse the opponents. They did not have anything to say to the opponents. "West Indian players always had a smile on their face when they came in at the end of day's play to talk with you and to commiserate when you lost, you could see that there was no arrogance there," he said.

Printer friendly page
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Sport