Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Friday, Apr 20, 2007
ePaper
Google


Mpingi

New Delhi
News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

New Delhi Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

CAT notice to ICAR on `cooked up' report

Staff Reporter

The matter will come up for hearing on May 4

NEW DELHI: The Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) has sought replies from the Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR), the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) and others on an affidavit by a scientist of the Council alleging that the inquiry officer appointed by the ICAR to probe the charge of misconduct against him had conducted not a single proceedings and had "cooked up" the report.

The president of the Council ordered the inquiry in 2001, and inquiry officer S.R. Misra submitted the report in 2006, holding that the charges levelled against scientist S. S. Tomar were valid and the Council could take action against him as per law.

Thereafter, Mr. Tomar moved CAT last year challenging the report submitting that the inquiry was itself flawed.

Mr. Tomar levelled the allegation of "fake inquiry" after inspecting files at the Council's headquarters here and at the CVC on a direction by the Central Information Commission (CIC) on a bunch of petitions filed by him under the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

The affidavit accused the inquiry officer of charging the allowances even without visiting the venue of inquiry.

Mr. Tomar further said the inquiry officer was biased against him because he (Mr. Tomar) had filed several complaints against him with several authorities, including with the Central Bureau of Investigation and the CVC.

He further stated that the inquiry officer could not conduct such an inquiry against him because only the Commissioner for Departmental Inquiry (CDI) of the CVC could conduct such a probe.

Besides, the inquiry officer was junior to Mr. Tomar and therefore he could not conduct an inquiry against him, the affidavit said.

The Principal Bench of the Tribunal directed the respondents, including the inquiry officer, to file their replies to the allegations within a week.

The matter will now come up for hearing on May 4.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



New Delhi

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |




News Update



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Copyright © 2007, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu