The Hindu : Front Page : “Long-term scenario taken care of in deal”

Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Monday, Aug 06, 2007
ePaper

Front Page

Front Page

“Long-term scenario taken care of in deal”

“No mention of any foreign policy prescription in draft 123 agreement”
“Legally, conditions remain the same on nuclear test”

Mumbai: Indian experts took utmost care to include several “insulation mechanisms” in the draft agreement to implement the nuclear deal with the United States to protect security and nuclear commerce interests, official sources have said.

Though the civil nuclear cooperation and the draft 123 agreement, which was made public on Friday, is between two “unequal partners,” the experts took all possible long-term scenarios into consideration in the interest of the country, say the sources familiar with the negotiations.

Nuclear test

Reacting to concerns expressed by some quarters about the pact curtailing India’s right to conduct a nuclear test, a source said: “Every article of the draft 123 agreement is carefully worded with many in-built insulation mechanisms to protect India’s interest.”

Security situations

Though the deal is for civil nuclear cooperation, India has taken all possible security situations into consideration and Article 14 of the agreement clearly states that both India and the U.S. have agreed to carefully consider the circumstances that may lead to termination or cessation of such cooperation, according to the sources.

The two sides also agreed to take into account whether the circumstances that may lead to such a termination or cessation resulted from India’s serious concern about a changed security environment or were a response to “actions by other states which would impact national security.”

Additional penalty

Legally, the conditions remain the same whether India conducts a nuclear test now or after signing the deal. But if the testing is done after the signing of the agreement, “there would be an additional economic penalty,” the sources said.

Article 14 also points out that if one side seeks the termination of the pact while citing a violation of the agreement as the reason, the U.S. and India will have to consider whether the action was inadvertent or otherwise and whether “the violation could be considered as material.”

It is also made explicitly clear in the same Article that no violation can be considered as “material” unless it corresponds to the definition of “material violation or breach” in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the sources said. — PTI

Printer friendly page
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Front Page