![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, Aug 20, 2007 ePaper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Karnataka |
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Classifieds | Jobs |
Karnataka
-
Bangalore
Staff Reporter
‘LDA floated tenders for private management’ ‘Supreme Court judgments have pointed out that the scheme is illegal’
BANGALORE: The 150-acre water body at Hebbal continues to be the churning point of discontent against the State Government’s policy of privatisation of common property resources. Even the offer by East India Hotels, parent company of the Oberoi that was awarded the lease to manage Hebbal lake, to modify its project proposal to supposedly address ecological concerns has not cut ice with a section of environmentalists. The latter wants nothing less than a complete overhaul of the public-private partnership. The Lake Development Authority (LDA), with its jurisdiction covering all the city’s lakes, introduced a scheme in 2004 — Expression of Interest — wherein private parties could bid for water bodies and “develop and maintain” them for the next 15 years. Nagawara lake has been handed over to Lumbini Gardens. Hebbal and Agaram lakes have been leased out to private companies and more than 50 lakes are all designated to be privatised. Private management includes setting up commercial enterprises in the lake and charging an entry fee. “We must first question whether it is acceptable to privatise public spaces. If that is wrong, then the agency to be targeted is the LDA,” Rohan D’Souza of Hasiru Usiru, an environment group, told The Hindu. The mo st important question the LDA must answer is why lakes are being handed over to private groups when there is no dearth of money for the management of these water bodies. Leo Saldanha of Environment Support Group agrees. Since LDA is the agency that floated tenders for private management of lakes and approved the projects submitted by companies, this department must justify why commercialisation of water bodies is being allowed. “It must also answer why this scheme was pushed forward when Supreme Court judgments pointing out to its illegality was brought to the notice of the LDA,” he said. A 2006 judgment states that tanks are common property and should be maintained in a manner that does not exclude traditional users of the lake. Mr. Saldanha questioned why the over Rs. 2 crore Indo-Norwegian Environment Programme was dismissed in the detailed project report (DPR) as a failure. “Elsewhere in the project, it says that the water-holding capacity of the tank will increase from 849 million litres to 1,300 million litres after removal of silt. How did they arrive at the numbers?” he asked. “Hebbal lake is one of the important wetland habitats here. The project aims to turn it into what resembles a theme park. How did the LDA approve this?” he asked.
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2007, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|