Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Tuesday, Sep 11, 2007
ePaper
Google



Karnataka
News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |


ICICI Bank

Karnataka - Bangalore Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

State produces records of Chancellor

Staff Reporter

BANGALORE: The State Government on Monday placed before the Karnataka High Court, records of the Chancellor of Bangalore University ordering an inquiry against Prof. Venkataramannappa for alleged plagiarism of his doctoral thesis.

A Division Bench comprising Justice Chidananda Ullal and Justice Nagmohan Das, had on the last hearing, directed the State Government to procure and place before it records of the Chancellor directing a panel to look into the complaint of plagiarism. Mr. Venkataramannappa, a professor of Bangalore University, had appealed against a single judge order refusing to interfere with the inquiry ordered by the Chancellor against him.

He said he was awarded a doctorate in 2002 for his work on ‘Small farmers in Karnataka—a sociological study’. However, some persons who had a grouse against him complained that the doctoral thesis was plagiarised. On February 13, 2003, the university referred the thesis to the Institute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC), Bangalore, for its opinion. The institute sent its opinion to the university, which then constituted a three-member commission of experts to look into the issue. The committee, he said, rejected the charge of plagiarism. Subsequently, the Chancellor appointed a committee on August 30, 2006, to go into the issue. Mr. Venkataramannappa had appealed to the High Court against the constitution of the committee and also urged it to restrain the panel from going ahead with the inquiry. Rejecting the petition, a single judge had said the matter required detailed clarification and since this is a finding of a fact, it can be done only by a commission. He said the petitioner, instead of participating in the inquiry, had rushed to the courtMr. Venkataramannappa had filed an appeal against the single judge order. Advocate-General Uday Holla said the Chancellor’s action in ordering an inquiry is as per law. He urged the court to dismiss the appeal seeking a stay of the single judge order. The Bench adjourned further hearing on the case.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



Karnataka

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


News Update



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Copyright 2007, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu