![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, Oct 02, 2007 ePaper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Opinion |
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs |
Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
This refers to the Supreme Court’s special sitting on a Sunday to hear a petition filed by the AIADMK, and its order staying the Tamil Nadu bandh called by the DMK and its allies. Has a bandh never taken place in this country after the apex court judgment of 1998 banning bandhs? What is the big difference between a strike or hartal and a bandh? And what was the need to conduct a special sitting on a holiday? Again, what was wrong on the part of the DMK and its allies in observing a fast, a Gandhian mode of demonstration? A Supreme Court judge’s oral observation that the UPA government should not feel shy of dismissing the Tamil Nadu government is a clear case of judicial overreach and high-handedness. Does a party that strive for the betterment and economic prosperity of the State it rules deserve such criticism?
R.M. Manoharan,
Madhan Anbalagan,
Rameeza A. Rasheed,
Kasim Sait,
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2007, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|