Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Monday, Nov 05, 2007
ePaper
Google



Opinion
News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

Opinion - Editorials Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Towards greater transparency

Pharmaceutical companies and doctors make for uneasy bedfellows. While the two cannot ignore each other, there is the growing expectation that doctors would keep drug companies at arm’s length. There is much evidence to show that pharmaceutical companies have uncanny ways of influencing doctors’ prescribing decisions. Expensive gifts, sponsored conferences, lavish holidays, compromised medical education in the garb of continuing medical education have all becom e common. The malady has eroded the health care system to such an extent that practices such as unnecessary medication, prescribing expensive medicines when cheaper equivalents are available, and “premature adoption of novel treatments” do not keep the best interests of patients in mind. The British Medical Journal in 2003 reported that drug companies did admit to rewarding doctors for switching from one drug to another but maintained that this was “standard industry practice.” It is common sense that companies would not “spend $19 billion each year establishing and maintaining [the relationship]” unless it translated into increased sales.

A bill introduced recently in the U.S. Senate aims to bring about more transparency. The Physicians Payments Sunshine Act requires manufacturers of drugs and medical devices with an annual turnover of $100 million to disclose the payments made to doctors. While this is the first time that efforts are being made at the national level, five States and the District of Columbia already have such disclosure laws in place. Though such local initiatives have been largely successful, a legislation with sufficient teeth to ensure full disclosure is required. To be truly effective, the legislation should make doctors equally accountable. While it would be ambitious to expect the legislation to completely cleanse the system, it can be hoped that drug companies that have a dubious relationship with every arm, starting with the regulatory authority down to the patient groups, will be forced to be more careful and transparent in their promotional activities.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



Opinion

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


News Update


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Copyright © 2007, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu