![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, Nov 06, 2007 ePaper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| National |
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
National
New Delhi: Throwing waste into someone’s place is a “grave and sudden provocation,” and a person who kills such an offender cannot be convicted for murder, the Supreme Court has said. In such a case, the accused can be convicted only for the offence of “culpable homicide not amounting to murder,” it said, while reducing the life sentence of the accused charged with killing a person over a dispute. “In our opinion, throwing waste and rubbish inside the house or shop of somebody is certainly a grave and sudden provocation. Everyone wishes to keep his premises neat and clean, and is likely to lose his self-control in such a situation,” a Bench of Justices A.K. Mathur and Markandeya Katju observed. Case in questionThe Bench made the observation, while reducing to five-year rigorous imprisonment the life sentence of Muthu, an employee of a paper merchant in Tamil Nadu, who stabbed to death rag-picker Siva on April 9, 1998, after the latter allegedly threw rubbish into the shop. According to the prosecution, after Siva threw the rubbish, an altercation ensued during which Muthu picked up a knife in the shop and stabbed the former. A trial court had convicted Muthu to life imprisonment under IPC Section 302 (murder), which was affirmed by the Madras High Court. However, the Supreme Court reasoned that Muthu’s offence fell under Exception 4 of Section 300 (IPC section defines murder and culpable homicide). It noted that the murder was not pre-meditated. “If rubbish is thrown into one’s house or shop, one would naturally get very upset. It is evident that the accused had no motive or intention to cause death to the deceased since the accused was not carrying the knife from before and only picked it up during the scuffle with the deceased,” the Bench observed. — PTI
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2007, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|