![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, Nov 27, 2007 ePaper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Opinion |
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
Bangladeshi writer Taslima Nasreen has expressed her desire to be back in Kolkata. The West Bengal government, assuring her security, has said she is free to return to the city. The State government’s gesture is laudable. But in view of the grave violence that erupted in Kolkata against the extension of her visa by six months, it would be better for her to opt for a State where religious fanaticism has not raised its head. The need of the hour is pragmatism, which will serve the interests of the writer as well as the country that has given her a place to live. K.D. Viswanathan, Coimbatore Taslima’s plight is a haunting reminder of the rapidly disappearing civil space where dialogue and negotiations are possible. Assuming that India is still a democratic state, it is disappointing to see that a creative shift from the accepted norms of expression can result in a “witch hunt.” We like celebrity guests only as long as they don’t get controversial. The treatment meted out to Taslima by us does not speak well of our hospitality for a woman who was given permission by our own elected government to stay in our country. The Centre has seen it fit to extend Taslima’s visa. If people have problems with it, surely the way out is not hounding her? V. Ira, Hyderabad It shows how warped his understanding of Indian secularism is. It proves that people like him will never understand the secular ethos that is intrinsic to Indian culture. P.P. Sudhakaran, Bangalore The Centre should lose no time in offering her citizenship. It should protect her and guarantee her the freedom to pursue her legitimate activities in the city of her choice. The example set by the British government in protecting Salman Rushdie — a naturalised citizen — is worth emulating. Bernard Thangasamy, Coimbatore It is becoming increasingly evident that religion and peace cannot coexist; we have to choose between them. S.P. Asokan, Cuddalore P.U. Krishnan, Udhagamandalam If criticising the tenets of a religion is a ‘sin,’ we will find many ‘sinners’ living among us. If Dr. Abdullah’s yardstick is applied, all rationalists and atheists will have no place to exist in this world. A. Gandhi, Chennai It is of course unfortunate that Taslima is undergoing a great deal of suffering. But it is also true that she is responsible for it. She was aware of the consequences of her writings. Freedom of expression does not mean you can hurt a section. My suggestion to her is that she should learn a lesson or two from her experience in India and avoid getting into controversies hereafter. V.M. Khaleelur Rahman, Ambur S. Ramkumar, Chennai
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2007, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|