![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, Dec 17, 2007 ePaper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Karnataka |
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
Karnataka
Erosion of joint families has hastened the decline in the size of farm holdings Marginal holdings account for 48.2 per cent of the total holdings BANGALORE: The average size of operational farm holdings in Karnataka has declined by 49 per cent over the last three decades. Agricultural holdings have been fragmented and subdivided mainly to cater to the demand of non-farming activities, including industry. The erosion of joint families has also hastened the decline in the size of farm holdings. The Eighth Agricultural Census Report – Part I (2007) brought out by the State Government indicated that the average size of operational holdings declined significantly from 3.20 hectares in 1970-71 to 1.63 hectares in 2005-06, a decline of 49.1 per cent. The census was conducted with the aim of collecting data on the number and area of operational holdings, use of fertilizers and organic manures, agricultural implements, livestock, and access to credit and certified seeds in the State. The total number of operational holdings registered an increase from 70.79 lakh in 2000-01 to 75.81 lakh in 2005-06, an increase of 7.1 per cent. During the first agricultural census in 1970-71, the number of operational holdings was 35.51 lakh. The marginal holdings, which constituted less than one hectare, accounted for 48.2 per cent of the total holdings, followed by small holdings (1 to 2 hectares) — 26.60 per cent; semi-medium holdings (2 to 4 hectares) — 16.9 per cent; medium holdings (4 to 10 hectares) — 7.30 per cent; and large holdings (10 hectares and above) — one per cent. Agricultural scientists and economists are of the view that the average size of the operational holdings declined due to several factors. Acquisition of farmland by the government for industrial parks, special economic zones, and mega industries led to the decline in the availability of land for cultivation, particularly in districts such as Bangalore Urban and Rural, Mysore, Dakshina Kannada and Dharwad. Urbanisation and sale of farmland by farmers in distress were the other factors that reduced the size of individual holdings. Interestingly, among the social groups, the total number of holdings of Scheduled Castes group (8.82 lakh) increased by 7.2 per cent in the last five years. In case of Scheduled Tribes, the number is up from 3.82 lakh in 2000-01 to 4.39 lakh, an increase of 14.9 per cent. The survey showed that the area operated by the Scheduled Castes group declined in Bijapur, Haveri and Shimoga districts during the last five years. Similar trend was found for the Scheduled Tribes group in Bijapur, Koppal, Chikmagalur, Bangalore Urban and Rural districts. The area operated by the Scheduled Castes group increased by 20 per cent in Dakshina Kannada, while it is only 1.1 per cent in Gulbarga district in the last five years. The district-wise data revealed that Gulbarga topped the list with 5.76 lakh operational holdings, followed by Belgaum 5.33 lakh, Mandya 5.24 lakh, Hassan 4.71 lakh, Tumkur 4.23 lakh, and Kodadu with 0.72 lakh. As regards average size of operational holdings, Bijapur is at the top with 3.03 hectares followed by Dharwad 2.75 hectares, Gadag 2.39 hectares, Kodagu 2.43 hectares, Gulbarga 2.39 hectares, Bagalkot and Raichur 2.29 hectares and Mandya 0.61 hectares.
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2007, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|