![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, Dec 19, 2007 ePaper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Opinion |
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
As pointed out in the editorial “A welcome realisation” (Dec. 14), judicial overreach has damaged the other institutions of democracy. Instances are not wanting when the judiciary has exceeded its limits. At the same time, it is also true that it has delivered a number of progressive verdicts. Though the Chief Justice has stated that the apex court is not bound by the observation of Justices Markandey Katju and A.K. Mathur on judicial restraint, it has answered the question: ‘who should bell the cat?’ S. Nallasivan, Tirunelveli P. Senthil Saravana Durai, Vazhavallan Is water-sharing among the States a matter to be resolved by the executive or the judiciary? The dividing line between the three arms of the state is thin. If it is occasionally crossed in the interest of the people, it will not amount to overreach or trespass. G. Shanmuganathan, Chennai S. Thyagarajan, Chennai
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2007, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|