Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Thursday, Jan 31, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version
Google



New Delhi
News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

New Delhi Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Restore anticipatory bail provision, Supreme Court tells Uttar Pradesh

J. Venkatesan

New Delhi: Justice Markandey Katju of the Supreme Court has recommended to the Uttar Pradesh Government to issue an Ordinance to restore the provision for anticipatory bail to an accused. The Uttar Pradesh Government had amended the Cr. P.C. in 1976 to withdraw this provision in the State.

Justice Katju, sitting in a Bench with Justice H.K. Sema, made this recommendation while dismissing an appeal from Som Mittal, Managing Director of a company, against a Karnataka High Court judgment refusing to quash criminal proceedings initiated against him under the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act for the alleged murder of a woman employee while she was returning home from her workplace.

Justice Sema said the High Court could not exercise its inherent power under Section 482 Cr. P.C. (to quash a criminal proceeding) in a routine manner. The power under this Section must be exercised sparingly with circumspection and in rarest of rare cases. Justice Katju agreed with Justice Sema’s conclusions but cited the situation prevalent in Uttar Pradesh where courts were flooded with petitions under Section 482 seeking to quash criminal proceedings since there was no anticipatory bail provision in that State. Justice Katju said that it was necessary to restore the provision for anticipatory bail to empower the Allahabad High Court as well as the Sessions Courts in Uttar Pradesh to grant anticipatory bail. He said that an individual’s arrest on frivolous grounds violated his fundamental right and the absence of the provision was causing hardship as scores of false dowry harassment cases were being filed against innocent people.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



New Delhi

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


News Update



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu