Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Tuesday, Feb 19, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version
Google



New Delhi
The Hindu E-paper

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs |

New Delhi Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Professor cleared in harassment case

Parul Sharma


Nine girl students had complained of “harassment”

We are shocked by the report, claims one of the girls


NEW DELHI: The Complaint Screening Committee of the Gender Sensitisation Committee Against Sexual Harassment (GSCASH) at Jawaharlal Nehru University here has given a clean chit to a professor accused of sexual harassment in the absence of any evidence or any witness in the case.

Last September, nine girl students had complained that the then chairperson of the Special Centre for Sanskrit Studies C. Upendra Rao was subjecting them to “harassment”. He was later asked to hand over charge to another professor of the centre. In their final report to the administration, members of the Screening Committee noted: “There is no evidence to back any of the charges and there are no witnesses in any of the cases…the screening committee feels that there is a lack of sufficient grounds to recommend a full-fledged inquiry.”

“The charges are not sustainable as there are no witnesses to substantiate the claims of the complainants… the complaints emanate more because of a communication gap as Dr. C.U. Rao is relatively new to the JNU culture and ethos and seems to be following a different behavioural pattern.”

In their first letter to the JNU Vice-Chancellor in August, some girls had alleged: “Every second girl student of the centre has been victimised by him in various ways on different occasions, from offering lifts, shaking hands…” On these charges, the Committee opined: “…such actions as offering lift, shaking hands and also calling into office for signing the documents can’t be viewed as sexual harassment in normal circumstances…” Feeling vindicated, Dr. Rao said he had expected this verdict since he was “innocent” and the entire episode was a “handiwork of vested interests”. When contacted, one of the girls who had complained said they were not satisfied with the report and would approach the appeals committee. “We are shocked by the report. This is like mental torture for all of us. There was a strong lobby in his favour. There is no transparency and we will re-register our complaint.”

Interestingly despite the report being in his favour, Dr. Rao has not been reinstated and the administration has asked the Dean of School of Language, Literature and Culture Studies Varyam Singh to take over as chairperson.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



New Delhi

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Updates: Breaking News |


News Update



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu