Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Tuesday, Mar 04, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version
Google



New Delhi
The Hindu E-paper

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

New Delhi Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

PIL in Supreme Court: how was 60,000-crore waiver arrived at?

Legal Correspondent


Finance Ministry, RBI must present list of banks and loan particulars

“Relief may be specific to Maharashtra or U.P. for political reasons”


New Delhi: The budget proposal to waive farm loans to the tune of Rs. 60,000 crore has been challenged in the Supreme Court through a public interest litigation petition.

Advocate Manohar Lal Sharma on Monday made a mention before a Bench comprising Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice R.V. Raveendran for expeditious hearing of the petition, which questioned the basis on which the government arrived at the Rs 60,000-crore figure.

Refusing to grant early hearing, the Chief Justice told counsel: “It is a budget proposal. We don’t want to discuss the matter which is going to be discussed in Parliament. No early hearing can be given. It will be listed in due course. You may go to the appropriate forum.”

The petition sought a direction to the Finance Ministry and the Reserve Bank of India to place before the court the list of banks and particulars of the loan amount due to them. Contending that that the write-off was limited to farmers who had taken loans from nationalised banks, the petition sought a direction that the loan waiver scheme be extended to all those who had taken loans from private moneylenders and private banks.

Political reasons

“The proposal does not provide relief to all farmers in the country. It may be specific to farmers of Maharashtra or Uttar Pradesh for political reasons as there is no list or detail of relief to farmers in other States.” It was not clear whether the scheme was intended only to those farmers who owned land and also to those who were cultivating land on lease, the petitioner said.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



New Delhi

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


News Update



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu