![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, Mar 14, 2008 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Opinion |
![]() |
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
The editorial “Blatant partisanship” (March 13) is enlightening. Governor S.S. Sidhu should have invited the post-coalition, 31-strong Meghalaya Progressive Alliance to form a government. As correctly pointed out, the Constitution does not bestow on the single largest party, in this case the Congress, an automatic right to be invited to form a government. Political parties violating all parliamentary conventions are responsible for bringing the entire system under pressure and burdening the judiciary with absolutely avoidable litigation. The Congress, with a string of losses, is further losing sympathy among the people.
R. Gangadhara Sastry,
When the MPA has 31 members against the Congress’ 25, inviting the latter to form the government is nothing but a browbeating exercise and an act prejudicial to the interests of democracy. By doing so, Governor Sidhu has not only erred but also kept the door open for horse-trading.
T. Selvaraj,
The Governor has rightly asked the leader of the single largest party to form the government. Post-electoral alliances are opportunistic, and bereft of ideological cohesion and a common minimum programme.
P.V. Ramanarao,
The Supreme Court’s refusal to pass any order on the writ petition challenging Governor Sidhu’s decision is welcome. Much horse-trading could take place between now and the day of the floor test but that is politics. As the judges have observed, elected members are honourable men and should be trusted.
D.B.N. Murthy,
It is nothing but action replay in Meghalaya. The Governors are appointed on the recommendation of the party in power at the Centre. Since they are either partymen or party favourites, their allegiance rests with the party rather than the Constitution. They protect party interests even at the cost of propriety of the constitutional office they hold. The situation cannot change unless the process of appointing Governors is changed.
M.C. Joshi,
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2008, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|