![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, Mar 14, 2008 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| International |
![]() |
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
International
Washington: The Government of India is “committed” to the civilian nuclear deal with the U.S., Indian Ambassador Ronen Sen said here. But New Delhi was bound only by the bilateral 123 Agreement. His comments come ahead of the crucial March 17 United Progressive Alliance-Left committee meeting in the context of an ultimatum by the Left parties, which are supporting the government from outside, to make its stand clear on the deal. “As far as the status of the civilian nuclear cooperation agreement is concerned ... I would like to say clearly and categorically that the government is committed to that,” Mr. Sen told a gathering at the ‘India Initiative’ programme of the Sigur Center for Asian Studies at the George Washington University. “There is still work in progress. We are a democracy and there are certain processes which have to be over and that is not complete; and we have to take subsequent steps from international forums,” he said referring to the safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency and an exemption from the Nuclear Suppliers Group. PrerequisiteThe safeguards agreement, along with the NSG waiver, is a prerequisite for operationalising the nuclear deal. “We hope that these steps will be completed as soon as possible so that this agreement will come into force,” Mr. Sen said. “As far as we are concerned — that is the Government of India — we are committed to the bilateral agreement which we have worked out after long negotiations ... What we are bound by is the 123 Agreement,” Mr. Sen stressed in response to a question. “As far as the NSG, I don’t want to anticipate what the conclusion will be but we expect a clear exemption.” Mutual benefitNo agreement on any issue could and would be long-lasting unless it was perceived to be of mutual benefit, he said. “There is a debate going on in both our countries ... as democracies we have to take decisions through our democratic process,” the envoy said. “But I don’t think any of us would want to lecture the other on what we should do or should not do,” the Ambassador said. — PTI
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2008, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|