Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Monday, Mar 31, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version
Google



New Delhi
Sunday Magazine

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

New Delhi Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Keep off policy decisions, Bench asks courts

Legal Correspondent

It’s for government to decide what policies should be adopted


When no fundamental right is infringed, court cannot interfere

Court should not substitute its judgment for executive’s judgment


New Delhi: Courts must not interfere with policy decisions. These must be left to the government which alone can decide what should be adopted after considering all aspects, the Supreme Court has held.

“In the matter of policy decisions or exercise of discretion by the government, so long as infringement of fundamental right is not shown, courts will have no occasion to interfere. The court will not and should not substitute its own judgment for the judgment of the executive in such matters,” said a Bench comprising Justices Arijit Pasayat, C. K. Thakker and L. S. Panta.

Writing the judgment, Justice Pasayat said: “In matters of policy decisions, the scope for interference is extremely limited.” In assessing the propriety of a decision, the court could not interfere even if a second view different from that of the government was possible.

In the instant case, the Uttar Pradesh government created a new district, Baghpat. Acting on a petition challenging the notification, the Allahabad High Court asked the State to reconsider its decision.

“Erroneous approach”

In its appeal against this judgment, the government said the High Court’s approach was clearly erroneous. In matters of policy decision such as creation of a district or State, the High Court should not have interfered, that too on wholly irrelevant grounds.

On behalf of the respondents, it was submitted that a district should not be created routinely and the High Court rightly took note of several factors.

Allowing the State’s appeal, the Bench said: “The Cabinet decision was taken nearly eight years ago and [it] appears to be operative. That being so, there is no scope for directing reconsideration.”

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



New Delhi

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


News Update



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu