![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, Apr 03, 2008 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| National |
![]() |
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
National
“Over 1515 hectare forest land illegally diverted without permission of Government of India” Compensatory afforestation not carried out in 70 per cent of the projects between 1997 and 2007 BHOPAL: The Comptroller and Auditor General’s Audit Report 2006-2007 for Madhya Pradesh exposes serious violation of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 by pointing out that mandatory compensatory afforestation (CA) was not carried out in 70 per cent of the projects where forest land was diverted for non-forest purposes during last ten year period (1997-2007) in the State. As per the provisions of the Act, prior permission of the Government of India was essential for diversion of forest lands for non-forest purposes. While approving a proposal under the Act, the Central Government stipulates mandatory compensatory conservation measures such as compensatory afforestation and catchment area treatment -- the cost of which is borne by the user agencies. Performance Audit of the implementation of the Forest (Conservation) Act in Madhya Pradesh revealed significant cases of violation of the Act and absence of execution of compensatory conservation measures in most of the cases where forest land had been diverted for non-forest purposes. As a result, objectives of the Act largely remain unachieved in the State, the CAG Report points out. Performance audit by the CAG shows that in 43 cases, 1515.997 hectare forest land was “illegally” diverted without prior permission of the Government of India during last 10 years. Compensatory afforestation was not carried out in 70 per cent of the projects where forest land was diverted for non-forest purposes between 1997 and 2007. Only 6 per cent of the funds received from user agencies on account of cost of CA were utilised during this period. Fifty-three out of the 56 compensatory afforestation plantations raised on Jhabua land bank during the period 1997-2000 failed due to non-allotment of funds by the Government for maintenance and protection of plants, resulting in wasteful expenditure of Rs.2.04 crore. On scrutiny of the records of eight forest divisions -- Betul (North), Chhindwara (West), Damoh, Indore, Jhabua, Satna, Sheopur, and Umaria — the CAG has found illegal diversion of 1507.391 hectare of forest land in 41 cases by 11 user agencies -- Western Coalfields Ltd., South Eastern Coalfields Ltd., Sharda Management Committee, Water Resources Department, RES Division Jhabua, RES Division Sheopur, Janpad Panchayat Jabera, Public Works Department, Rajiv Gandhi Mission, Tendukheda Janpad Panchayat, and Gram Panchayat, Amlipada. Prior approval from the Government of India was not obtained in these cases. Further, scrutiny of records in Sehore and Satna territorial divisions revealed illegal diversion of 8.606 hectare forest land by two user agencies -- M/s Maihar Cement Ltd. and Water Resources Department -- in excess of the area approved by the Central Government. The CAG also pointed out that as per the provisions of the Act, cases of violation of the Act, required to be reported by the State Government to the Central Government so that penal action could be initiated, was also not done.
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2008, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|