Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Wednesday, Apr 09, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version
Google



Opinion
The Hindu E-paper

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

Opinion - Letters to the Editor Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

M.S. Gill precedent

The article “Implications of the M.S. Gill precedent” (April 8) rightly says the former Chief Election Commissioner’s induction in the Council of Ministers has set a wrong precedent. The framers of the Constitution would not have foreseen such a scenario. Not everything can be written down in the Constitution. We need to develop healthy constitutional traditions.

Maybe it is time to amend the Constitution to incorporate restrictions on the post-retirement options of Election Commissioners to ensure the independence of the high constitutional office. The Election Commission should not only be impartial but must also be seen to be impartial.

Avuthu Srihari,

Secunderabad

* * *

Dr. Gill’s induction into the Ministry is a powerful bait to constitutional functionaries and is likely to pollute the sanctity of institutions that provide a firm bulwark to the Indian democracy. The political dispensation is out to defile all conventions and institutions that were assiduously cultivated by the builders of the nation. More such allurements will herald the systemic collapse of the polity.

M.A. Siraj,

Bangalore

* * *

Most government employees have preference for one political party or the other. The issue that should concern us is whether they discharge their duties on merit. A law can be enacted saying a government employee cannot contest an election for five years after retirement or resignation on any party ticket. He can do so as an independent candidate without any outside support.

A. Amudhavanan,

Alangulam

* * *

When a constitutional functionary, who is expected to be apolitical, is given a political post after retirement, the common citizen begins to doubt the neutrality he exercised while in power.

George Thomas,

Thiruvananthapuram

* * *

It is necessary to amend the Constitution to exclude the Election Commissioners from entering electoral politics or holding offices of profit after retirement. A dispassionate revisit is needed to identify the list of constitutional functionaries to be debarred for life from entering any legislative bodies or joining political parties.

G. Narayanasamy,

Chennai

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



Opinion

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


News Update


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Copyright 2008, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu