Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version
Google



Other States
Sunday Magazine

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

Other States - Orissa Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Lawyers of Ganjam Bar Association divided on reopening of courts

Staff Reporter

Hold emergency meeting to discuss future course of action

— Photo: Lingaraj Panda

Members of the Ganjam Bar Association participating in an emergency meeting in Berhampur on Monday.

BERHAMPUR: The lawyers’ of the Ganjam Bar Association were found to be divided on Monday on the issue whether the courts in the city should be allowed to reopen or not. These courts have remained closed for 139 days due to agitation by lawyers demanding establishment of a permanent bench of the High Court in the city.

Administration and police are all set to reopen the district judge court in the city and other courts on its premises on Tuesday.

According to police sources, 12 platoons of police forces will be deployed near the Berhampur court premises from Tuesday for the smooth reopening of the court. On last Tuesday a bench of the Orissa High Court taken serious exception to the manner in which lawyers in Berhampur and Sambalpurhad paralysed functioning of court.

The High Court had directed the Superintendents of Police (SP) of Berhampur and Sambalpur to take steps so that court work was not disrupted.

On Monday the Ganjam Bar Association had an emergency meeting to discuss their future course of action. Clear division could be seen among the lawyers.

A group of lawyers wanted their agitation to continue in the manner it was continuing. They felt if the courts were reopened then their efforts through agitation since such a long period would go down the drains and it would weaken their demand for the permanent bench of the High Court in the city.

The other group which was led by the office-bearers of the association did not want to oppose any move to reopen the courts.

There were heated debates between the two groups.

Distinct difference

Speaking to The Hindu, the president of the Ganjam Bar Association, S.N. Rath admitted that there was distinct difference of opinion in the association over the issue of reopening of courts.

He, however, said that majority of the lawyers did not want to interfere or oppose the attempts by administration to reopen the courts. The lawyers’ opposing it were a minority, he said. “We had never resolved to close down the courts so we are not opposed to their reopening”, he said.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



Other States

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |



News Update



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu