Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Thursday, May 01, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version
Google



Opinion
Sunday Magazine

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

Opinion - News Analysis Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Is brain training really best way to boost IQ?

Emine Saner

According to her TV advert, after playing Brain Training on the Nintendo DS, Nicole Kidman, 39, has a brain age to match her strangely smooth-skinned face age: 24. The game on the handheld console, which includes memory and reaction time tests, was developed by the Japanese neuroscientist Ryuta Kawashima and has sold 10 million copies worldwide, spawning a craze for “brain training” that the New York Times estimated was worth more than $80m in the U.S. alone last year.

Newspapers print brain-training puzzles, you can get games on your mobile phone and computer, and there are a number of books. Though they make vague claims to boost brainpower, they are not regulated or subject to clinical trials.

So do they work? “There is no evidence these tests do anything to improve cognition,” says Jason Braithwaite, a cognitive and neuro-psychologist at the University of Birmingham. “They are no more worthwhile than playing chess or doing a sudoku puzzle or crossword. It won’t turn you into a superbrain.” Mr. Braithwaite says that the idea that you can reduce your brain’s age is “ridiculous. With these tests, you are improving your practice at very specific things [such as short-term memory or reaction times], but that doesn’t necessarily mean it gives you a general cognitive benefit.”

However, according to a new American study, computer-based brain training can improve IQ beyond becoming better at practised tasks. Half of the 70 volunteers were trained in tests that measured memory and reaction time. When tested on unrelated problems, those who had been trained performed better than those who hadn’t.

“There needs to be a large clinical trial on brain training,’ says Clive Ballard, director of research for the Alzheimer’s society. “These games are being marketed widely, but people could be wasting time and it raises false hope.” It is likely that many people buy these gadgets in the hope it will stave off Alzheimer’s. Mr. Ballard says that there is “much better evidence to say that [to reduce the risk] you’d be better off doing physical exercise than brain training.

— © Guardian Newspapers Limited, 2008

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



Opinion

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


News Update


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu