![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, Jun 16, 2008 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Business |
![]() |
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
Business
Many readers have pointed out that the concurrence expressed for the reader’s view that nephews and nieces are excluded from the definition of relatives is not correct because Item No. (iv) of the Explanation defining relative includes “brother or sister of either of the parents of the individual”. Individual in the definition is the donee so that the brother or the sister of either parent being the maternal or paternal uncle could be the donor. Such gift would be exempt as a gift from a relative. It follows that the children of a brother or sister would be the donees without attracting tax. It is only the lineal descendant that is the grand children of brother or sister could not be the donees. The answer in these columns in The Hindu dated June 9 would therefore stand corrected accordingly. The suggested amendment in the answer would, however, cover grand children of such brother or sister, but not in the definition, since lineal descendant of such brother or sister is not covered at present.
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2008, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|