![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, Jun 18, 2008 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Andhra Pradesh |
![]() |
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
Andhra Pradesh
The doctor is said to have parted with residential plot for laying road in 1984 Land abutting Boat Club is sought to be given to him as compensation Kakinada: Heated arguments ensued between members of the Congress and the TDP during the general body meeting of the Kakinada Municipal Corporation (KMC) here on Tuesday over the proposal to give away a piece of land abutting the Boat Club in lieu of a portion of a residential plot claimed to be forgone by one Sivaji Raju for laying a public road in 1984. A majority of the corporators rejected the proposal, saying that the land was required for public purpose and said the KMC need not be bound by Kakinada MLA Mutha Gopalakrishna’s recommendation to give the disputed land to Dr. Raju as compensation for the loss incurred by him. Mayor’s orderThe MLA’s followers among Congress corporators made a futile attempt to get the proposal cleared but their rivals within the ruling party and the TDP members put up strong resistance and they finally succeeded in securing an order by Mayor K. Saroja to give land at some other place in the city limits to Dr. Raju but not the one asked by him. Corporators, who favoured retention of the land near the Boat Club by the KMC, alleged that the MLA was bent on protecting Dr. Raju’s interests and that’s the reason why he made the recommended in the latter’s favour. They said that the matter should have been settled long back but giving away a highly valuable (approximately Rs. 15,000 per square yard) land in the midst of the city was not the solution. Some corporators opined that it was not proper for the KMC to lay a road through a private land. Even if there was a consensus among the parties (the KMC and the land owner), a monetary compensation would not have brought things thus far.
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2008, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|