New Delhi   

Centre explains procedure on appointment of judge

New Delhi: The Centre has maintained in the Supreme Court that in appointing an additional judge of a High Court as permanent judge, the collegium of the Chief Justice of India and two other judges would take into account the views of the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned and those judges of the High Court whom he had been consulted.

The Centre made this submission before a Bench of Justices Arijit Pasayat and M.K. Sharma hearing a petition filed by the former Union Law Minister, Shanthi Bhushan, and advocate Kamini Jaiswal challenging the appointment of Justice Ashok Kumar, Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High court. Earlier, Justice Ashok Kumar was in the Madras High Court.

The Bench, after hearing senior counsel Anil Divan and Additional Solicitor-General Gopal Subramaniam for the Centre directed the matter to be listed for final hearing on September 16.

Mr. Divan submitted that the Government of India should be directed to strictly follow its own Memorandum of Procedure (MoP) in regard to future appointments of permanent judges of High Courts, particularly those relating to appointments of additional judges. He said if the procedure was not followed such appointments should be treated as void.

The Centre in its affidavit quoting earlier Supreme Court judgments said as per the Memorandum of Procedure evolved as per the judgments, the Chief Justice of the High Court must consult two seniormost colleagues on the Bench and forward the same to the Chief Minister along with the recommendations.

The Chief Justice, while sending his recommendations for appointing an additional judge as a permanent judge, would need to furnish statistics of month-wise disposal of cases and judgments (of the judge concerned).

A copy of the advice of the Chief Minister would be endorsed to the Chief Justice of India and the Union Law Minister to expedite consideration. The MoP prescribes that the Law Minister would consider the recommendations in the light of such other reports as might be available to the government in respect of the names under Consideration and forward the same to the CJI for his advice.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Stories in this Section

A taste of world’s greatest cheese
A special world of music from North-East
BJP revokes suspension of MP
Antony orders probe into ‘harassment’ of woman officer
India, Myanmar to expand trade ties
Centre explains procedure on appointment of judge
Expressway users cannot escape toll
French scholarships for five Indian students
We stand united, says NDA
IP University offering more seats this academic year
British varsity opens its first office in India
Discussion on N-deal
Sheila conducts surprise check of Metro
Traders’ Day planned
‘Protect the interests of women workers’
Released on bail
Held for murder
Japanese funding for INTACH
Delhi High Court jurisdiction may be extended to NCR
Power cuts reported
MCD schools to get boundary walls
Reject revised drafts for world trade talks: CPI(M)

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu