Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Wednesday, Jul 23, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version
Google



National
Metroplus Theatrefest 2008

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs |



National Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Court: it is for Puducherry to name prosecutor in Sankararaman case

Legal Correspondent

New Delhi: Once a criminal case is shifted from one State to another, it is the prerogative of the State where the case is transferred to appoint the public prosecutor to conduct the trial, the Supreme Court has held.

A Bench comprising Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justices R.V. Raveendran and M.K. Sharma directed the Puducherry government to appoint the public prosecutor to conduct the Sankararaman murder case, in which the Kanchi Sankaracharya, Sri Jayendra Saraswathi, is the key accused.

Acting on his petition, the apex court in May 2006 stayed the trial.

Allowing his appeal challenging the Madras High Court judgment upholding the appointment of public prosecutors by the Tamil Nadu government, the Bench said: “The power of the State Government to appoint a public prosecutor and an additional public prosecutor would extend only for conducting any prosecution, appeal or other proceedings in the courts within the State. As per the procedure prescribed under Section 24 of Cr.PC., Tamil Nadu can appoint a public prosecutor to conduct criminal cases in any of the court in that State. Such powers cannot be exercised by the State government to conduct cases in any other State.”

Writing the judgment, the Chief Justice said: “Once the case is transferred as per Section 406 of the Cr.PC. to another State, the transferor State no longer has control over the prosecution to be conducted in a court situated in a different State to which the case has been transferred. It is the prerogative of the State government to appoint a public prosecutor to conduct the case which is pending in the sessions division of that State.”

The Bench, while directing the Puducherry government to appoint a public prosecutor, additional public prosecutor or special public prosecutor, asked the Tamil Nadu government to bear the expenses for conducting the trial.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



National

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Updates: Breaking News |


News Update


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu