Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Wednesday, Jul 30, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version
Google



New Delhi
Metroplus Theatrefest 2008

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

New Delhi Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Court sees little role for DU in posting of Stephen’s principal

Staff Reporter

Notices issued to the University Grants Commission and Delhi University

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court on Tuesday observed that the Delhi University should not interfere in the appointment of Principal of St. Stephen’s college in the Capital. “The Constitution has given autonomous power to the management of minority institutions like the college to take decisions in appointing their heads and other authorities should not interfere in it,” the Bench suggested, adding that choices of the managements of such institutions are absolute in the appointment of its principals.

The court’s observation came while hearing a petition filed by the college challenging an ordinance of the University through which it had directed the college to follow its direction in the appointment of Principal.

A Division Bench comprising Justice A.P. Shah and Justice S. Muralidhar issued notices to the University Grants Commission and Delhi University and asked the respondents to file replies to the petition by August 1.

The college submitted that the University had on March 20 directed it to send the names of candidates for appointment of a Principal.

Opposing the direction by the University, the college submitted that it was an encroachment on its autonomy as it was a minority institution under the relevant article of the Constitution.

The ordinance says that the college has to appoint a Principal recognised by the University. Under clause 7(2) of the ordinance the management has no choice but to appoint a person recognised by the University as the Principal which was unconstitutional as it amounted to takeover of the power of selection for the post vested in the minority institution, the petition said.

The University, on the other hand, justified the clause saying that the regulation was necessary for maintaining the quality of education in the college.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



New Delhi

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |



News Update



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu