Opinion - Letters to the Editor   

On disqualification

This is in response to the article “Case for Speaker’s disqualification” (July 30). Somnath Chatterjee neither defected nor voted against a whip issued by the CPI(M). I think all parties should respect the freedom of conscience of its members when it does not issue a whip asking them to vote in a particular way. It was perhaps wrong to have elected Mr. Chatterjee as Speaker.

The episode has shown that only MPs from ruling parties must be elected as they will support the government at all times. It is not wise to elect as Speaker an MP whose party is not part of the government.

K. Giridhar,

Hyderabad

The case for Mr. Chatterjee’s disqualification is based on the assumption that his refusal to resign as the Speaker as per the wishes of the CPI(M) amounted to his voluntarily giving up the membership of the party. While the act of giving up party membership can be express or implied, such an inference can be drawn only if an MP resorts to anti-party activity or supports rival parties, not if he refuses to toe the party line. There is hardly any similarity between the cases of Mr. Chatterjee and L.P. Barbosa. The contention that had Mr. Chatterjee supported the trust motion in the event of a tie, it would have amounted to defection is also unacceptable because the party did not issue a whip.

S.N. Shukla,

Lucknow

T.S. Venkata Ramani,

Chennai

T.S. Krishna Bhat,

Bangalore

The article “Mr. Speaker: the Indian ‘avatar’” (Aug. 1) has some concrete suggestions to restore the position of the Speaker. While the first two suggestions are logical and justified, the third one — “once a Speaker always a Speaker and a convention be established to re-elect him without contest” — seems to be far-fetched, as it is akin to issuing a blank cheque. Impartial conduct acceptable to all parties should constitute the sole criterion for the re-election of a Speaker without contest.

K.D. Viswanaathan,

Coimbatore

The anti-defection law gives the Indian Speaker an adjudicatory role to determine whether a legislator has defected or not. In such a scenario, notwithstanding the renewal of membership of the political party on whose ticket the Speaker was elected MP, he becomes a neutral person in law. He cannot attract the provisions of the anti-defection law.

P. Esakki Muthu,

Mumbai

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Stories in this Section

One more opportunity
Liberty on two wheels
India-Pakistan peace process: hopes & fears
How it all began in Hoshiarpur
Corrections and clarifications
On disqualification
Ahmedabad blasts
Fighting terror
“Democracy is a vital disciplining instrument”

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu