Opinion - Letters to the Editor   

Draconian laws

This refers to your editorial “Resist Draconian measures” (September 20). We have umpteen laws to deal with criminal, economic, social, civic, financial and political offences. But enforcement is very much lacking. For combating terrorism the existing laws such as the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 2004 are more than adequate — strict and fair enforcement without bias or misusing it to take revenge on political enemies is only necessary. There is no need for any fresh legislation.

R. Thirunarayanan,

Chidambaram

The editorial has raised some valid arguments against draconian anti-terror laws. There is no reason to believe that what happens to them if they are caught will deter terrorists and prevent terrorist attacks. There is no alternative to being ever-vigilant and taking steps to track down and destroy terrorist cells. The question is whether the country’s intelligence outfits and police force are up to the task. It may not be the number of men and women on the job alone that matters, but also their expertise.

K.Vijayakumar,

Bangalore

I differ from your editorial because it does not consider the wider aspect of recurring terrorism which kills hundreds, maims so many, and destroys property worth crores. Islamic jihadists have penetrated every sphere of life. Hence the need for a draconian law.

P.M.G. Pillai,

Mannar

It is a fact that terrorists have a deep-rooted base in the country. Their periodic attacks in various parts of the country show that they are well organised and have their strong presence practically in all parts of the country. Nobody likes innocent people to suffer on account of any provision in any law. But terrorist activities deserve no leniency. Draconian or otherwise, effective measures to crack the terrorist bases are necessary.

K.K.Cherian,

Bangalore

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Stories in this Section

Time for hard decisions
Sharp decline
Devising a coherent anti-terror framework
Making sense of the Appiko movement
PoK eyes cross-LoC trade for economic progress on its side
Call for ‘wholesale’ investment in agriculture
Direct cash transfer
Advisory to States
Draconian laws
Tributes to PR
Evolution vs creation
Pensioners’ plight
It is a negotiated draft: Pranab

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu