Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Thursday, Oct 02, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version
Google



Opinion
News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

Opinion - Letters to the Editor Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Anachronistic law

This is with reference to the editorial “Anachronistic law” (October 1). Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code is only one among the many regressive and archaic laws which continue to dot the pages of our statute books. India is perhaps the only nation in the world which has retained centuries’-old legislation without any serious public debate on their relevance or appropriateness. For instance, we are still governed by laws such as the Indian Police Act, 1861. The inability of our legal system to project a humane and progressive face can be attributed to the indifference of the political class. After all, social reforms do not guarantee electoral victories. But for judicial intervention we would never have had far reaching changes in areas such as child labour, safe blood transfusion, gender discrimination, humane treatment of animals, protection of environment, etc.

It is a travesty of justice if a nation’s outdated and poorly drafted laws end up as instruments of discrimination, persecution and exploitation of its own citizens.

V.N. Mukundarajan,

Thiruvananthapuram

* * *

Your editorial has pointed out that the practice of treating homosexuals as criminals should have no place in a modern, liberal society. But in a poor country like India where children are largely abused there is need for protection. So the Act has to be amended taking this into account.

Jacob Sahayam,

Thiruvananthapuram

* * *

The Health Ministry’s assurances must be welcomed. Yet, they seem to be part of a particular HIV discourse, and one suspects whether the honourable Minister’s assurances stem from concern for human rights, or the monetary aid that will enter India. Why is it then that lesbianism has again been ignored completely? Our clinical perspective on health does not seem to take into account sexuality and pleasure, as well as identity based movements, marginalising the right of women further as none of these is thought to be the purview of women.

Ammel Sharon,

Mumbai

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



Opinion

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


News Update


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu