The Hindu : Business : Vodafone loses tax case

Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Thursday, Dec 04, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version

Business

Business

Vodafone loses tax case

To file an appeal in the Supreme Court soon.

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Wednesday dismissed a petition by the Britain-based global mobile giant Vodafone, challenging a $1.7-billion tax notice served on the company related with the acquisition of majority stake in an Indian company last year for $11.1 billion.

The division bench of Justice S. Radhakrishnan and Justice Anand Nirgude, however, restrained the Income-tax Department from executing its tax notice for eight weeks to enable Vodafone to file an appeal, if it so intended.

“We will file an appeal in the Supreme Court soon,” said Dinesh Kanabar, the company’s tax consultant. The company declined further comment saying it would like to examine the full court order first. Vodafone had acquired the majority stake in what was then Hutch-Essar from Hong Kong-based Hutchison Whampoa, following which it was served a notice to pay capital gains tax of around $1.7 billion. The company now functions under the Vodafone brand.

The transaction was one of the largest mergers and acquisitions in India last year and experts said the court’s directive could have a potential implication on several other such acquisitions, both executed and potential.

The Mumbai-based Ruias, who run the Essar group, have a minority stake in the venture.

The Income-tax Department argued that the Britain-based firm was not exempt from paying such a tax, despite the transaction being concluded overseas, since the assets of the acquired company were predominantly in India.

Vodafone’s lawyers had also argued that the transaction was executed through a subsidiary based in the Netherlands and that since Hutchison was incorporated in Cayman Islands, India’s Income-tax Act did not apply.

They said transfer of controlling interest was not a transfer of capital assets, and that the tax was payable by Hutchison, which was not based in India. They said the Income-tax Act could not have extra-territorial jurisdiction.

But the tax administration said it expected Vodafone to deduct the tax at source before making the payment to Hutchison. It wanted to treat Vodafone as an agent of the non-resident company, Hutchison, under Sec. 163 of the Income-tax Act. — IANS

Printer friendly page
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Business