![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, Dec 23, 2008 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Opinion |
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
The controversy over Mr. Antulay’s remarks is uncalled for. What he demanded was only an inquiry into the circumstances leading to Karkare’s death. It is a pity that raising even an iota of doubt over the police version of the Mumbai attacks has been termed “anti-national and pro-Pakistan.” Muthi-ur-Rahman Siddiqui, Bangalore P.C. Hamza, Mannarkkad Bichu Muttathara, Pune Mr. Antulay may be guilty of being indiscreet and imprudent in his choice of time and place while making his now infamous statement over Karkare’s death. But he was only exercising his fundamental right to express his opinion. The big hue and cry over the remark, therefore, is misplaced. It is much ado about nothing. Shahabuddin Nadeem, Bangalore Rajan Singla, Gurgaon
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Ergo | Home |
Copyright © 2008, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|