![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, Jan 07, 2009 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| National |
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
National
“Supreme Court principles given the go-by” Magistrate had been pulled up earlier CHENNAI: Noting that a city Magistrate has taken on file a case which is essentially of a civil nature but given a cloak of criminal offence, the Madras High Court has said that it feels that stringent action should be taken against her. Allowing a petition seeking to quash the complaint and proceedings on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, the High Court also ordered costs of Rs.25,000 to be paid by the complainant to two petitioners in equal proportion. In his order, Justice K.Mohan Ram, said that as pointed out by the Supreme Court, criminal proceedings were not a short cut to other remedies available in law. Before issuing process, a criminal court had to exercise a great deal of caution. For the accused, it was a serious matter, but the Magistrate had given the go-by to the principles laid down by the Supreme Court and had taken the complaint on file without application of mind in a mechanical and cavalier manner. Such conduct on the Magistrate’s part was condemnable. If complaints of this nature, which were purely civil in nature, frivolous and vexatious, were taken on file indiscriminately without application of mind, the litigating public would not only be put to harassment, but would lose faith in the very judicial system. The Judge said that on an earlier occasion on coming to know of the indiscriminate manner in which private complaints filed under sections 156 (3) and 200 Cr.P.C. were being entertained by Judicial Magistrates/Metropolitan Magistrates in the State and after calling for details, Justice R. Regupathi, by a common order, had come down heavily on such Magistrates and one among them was the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore. But subsequent to the aforesaid directions also, some instances had come to the notice of the High Court that the Magistrate was adopting the same procedure. Mohan Nair and C.V. Ramesh filed a petition before the High Court seeking to quash the complaint filed for alleged fraud and cheating. The petitioners said they were served with summons from the X Metropolitan Magistrate court in August last year. The complainant’s name was given as M.S.Margasagayam. The petitioners submitted that the Magistrate had issued summons against them on the basis of a complaint in which there were no allegations whatsoever to show as to how and in what circumstances and in relation to what matter, the petitioners were alleged to have committed fraud and cheated the complainant.
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Ergo | Home |
Copyright © 2009, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|