![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, Jul 01, 2009 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Opinion |
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
Opinion
-
Interviews
Mehbooba Mufti: We have shown that we can deliver on our promises and represent the people’s desires and aspirations. In the short years between its birth in 1999 and the 2003 elections to the Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly, Mehbooba Mufti’s charismatic leadership drove the People’s Democratic Party from obscurity to power. Her spirited, polemical, and often-fiery rhetoric drew criticism but also popular support. But the almost-fairy tale success story began to unravel last year, after the PDP severed its alliance with the Congress and ended up losing power. Many commentators said the PDP was set to disintegrate. Now, though, the PDP has adroitly leveraged popular anger against human rights violations to regain lost ground. In this interview to The Hindu, Mehbooba Mufti discusses the fallout from the alleged rape-murders in Shopian, her own position in the violence that followed, and how the peace process in J&K might be rescued from the crisis that has beset both the State and neighbouring Pakistan. Not long ago, it used to be said that peace was around the corner in Jammu and Kashmir. But we’ve seen two major crises in less than a year – the Shrine Board violence last year, and now the Shopian agitation. What, in your view, is the cause of these crises? And what needs to be done to address them?You will recall that when Omar Abdullah took office as Chief Minister, he acknowledged that he was very fortunate — fortunate because the situation had become better than it was for his predecessors. Militant violence had come down, encounters had come down, and the people who voted in large numbers in the Assembly elections were expecting a positive political change. But what did they get? On day one, a deaf-and-dumb boy was shot dead outside the Chief Minister’s house. What did the official machinery do? Debate whether he was killed outside the Chief Minister’s house or the last Chief Minister’s house! It’s not as if human rights abuses disappeared after we took office in 2002. But the way we handled things convinced the people that the government was on their side, not their enemy. Now, look at the situation: two women are raped in gruesome circumstances and the government won’t even file a First Information Report. Investigating Shopian How do you respond to criticism that your own response to Shopian was incendiary? For example, you claimed that sindoor had been found in the hair of the victims, thereby making what happened in Shopian a communal issue.I only told the media what the families of the victims told me. I was sitting with the mother and sister of one of the victims — who said that she had a huge injury on her head and that something red, which looked like sindoor, was smeared on her hair. This was not a claim that came from me. But leave the sindoor issue aside. They also told me about several other terrible injuries the victims had sustained, which has since been confirmed by the forensic experts and the Justice Muzaffar Jan Commission of Inquiry. There was no doubt that the victims were raped. Why was the government dragging its feet on the investigation? Now, even in Delhi or Bangalore, if there are atrocities against women, people protest; they are very angry. But here, instead of asking the government why it delayed filing an FIR, people say I am adding fuel to the fire or toeing the separatist line. Should I help hush up rape and murder? What’s the link? The Jan Commission also says that vital evidence has been lost, and that the autopsies in the case have been badly botched. Why isn’t your party agitating for a proper scientific investigation by an impartial agency instead of linking this issue to demilitarisation?From the outset, I have asked for a proper investigation. First, I asked for an FIR to be filed. Now, I am asking for the guilty to be arrested. I also want political measures to be taken to address the public anger you see today — that is, demilitarisation. The troops have been here for twenty years, and have done their job. They have played their part by bringing down violence. Now, their presence has become a cause of friction with local people across Jammu and Kashmir. Climate of resentment But people in Shopian are pointing fingers at the J&K Police — not the Army or the Central Reserve Police Force. They claim the police are responsible not just for poor investigation, but also for raping and murdering the women. Allegations are also being made against the police in Baramulla; earlier it was the case in Ganderbal. How will removing the Army or CRPF help?See, it’s not just Shopian. There is a general climate of resentment against the Army and the CRPF. Just the other day, a CRPF man was beaten to pulp in Srinagar. Whatever happens, the first thing people presume is that the Army or the CRPF must have done it. Secondly, these forces were needed at a particular time and in a particular context. But now, even officials say there are only 500 militants. There are hardly any encounters. It is time to give the Army an honourable exit from Kashmir. Do you feel Union Home Minister Chidambaram is serious about troop cuts, which he said the Union Government was working to bring about?You will recall that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh announced troop cuts even when he first visited Kashmir, in 2003. Some 10,000 troops were pulled out, that’s all, and then it all came to a halt. Again in 2007, when our alliance with the Congress had reached a breaking point, a committee chaired by the Union Defence Secretary was set up to address the issue. Well, nothing very much happened. I think the Prime Minister is sincere but I am sorry to say there is a very negative mindset in New Delhi on this issue. They feel an iron fist is needed to deal with Kashmir. Address people’s concerns Those troop cuts were planned in a larger context: the secret dialogue between India and Pakistan, which led to five agreed principles for peace in J&K. Demilitarisation was one of those principles. But Pakistan was unable to push forward with the deal because of its internal problems, which have since worsened. After Mumbai, it is also difficult for India to open dialogue with Pakistan on Kashmir. What hope is there now?Nations talk not because it is a pleasant way to pass the time, but because there is no other choice. People in Jammu and Kashmir are angry. If we do not address their concerns, every six or eight months, you will have a crisis. It will undo all the hard-won gains of past years. What role do you envisage for the PDP in this process? In opposition, can it still play a constructive role in the peace process?Even though we are in opposition, we speak for the people of Kashmir. Our true strength is not reflected in the seats we have got. Our contribution to strengthening the peace process is by representing the people. People used to revile mainstream parties in Jammu and Kashmir for being agents of Delhi. Today, we have shown that we can deliver on our promises and represent their desires and aspirations. Corrections and Clarifications The answer to the fifth question in an interview "'Should I help hush up murder and rape?'" (Op-Ed, July 1, 2009) said that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh announced troop cuts even when he first visited Kashmir in 2003. Dr. Singh visited Jammu and Kashmir for the first time, as Prime Minister, on November 18, 2004.
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Ergo | Home |
Copyright © 2009, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|