Front Page   

Composite dialogue only after Pakistan’s action

NEW DELHI: Having started a “limited dialogue,” India was not keen on meeting the Pakistani insistence that the composite dialogue be resumed, till it was convinced not only of Islamabad’s sincerity in taking action against the perpetrators of the previous attacks but also of its motivation to prevent attacks like the one that occurred in Mumbai, said South Block sources.

Even if the limited dialogue was to go beyond the Foreign Secretary-level talks, India would refrain from restarting the composite dialogue format because Pakistan had not kept its promise, made in January 2004, of dismantling the terrorist training infrastructure. “There have been attacks after attacks after that pledge,” the sources said.

Denying that Pakistan submitted any dossier on Indian involvement in Balochistan, they pointed out that the only paper given by Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir on the night of July 14 at Sharm-el-Sheikh (Egypt) was titled “After the attacks in Mumbai.” It was a “bland” listing of the actions taken by Islamabad to “make it look that it had worked hard.”

On the India-Pakistan joint statement uncoupling the composite dialogue from action taken against the perpetrators of the Mumbai attacks, India felt this would ensure that action against terrorism was not held hostage to the composite dialogue. In future, Pakistan could not say because there was no composite dialogue no action could be taken.

“The fact is that it [joint statement] was drafted in bits and pieces. It was supposed to be reflective of what was discussed and since Pakistan Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani had mentioned Balochistan we had no problem in leaving it in. We would be happy to discuss Balochistan because we have clean hands and a clear conscience,” the sources maintained.

On the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) Agency chief Shuja Pasha’s offer to negotiate with India, they said India would tread carefully. “It is not the man but the institution. ISI is an important part of the Pakistani establishment but it is also the source of trouble for India. We will have to look at this offer carefully because the noise to signal ratio in Pakistan is very high.”

Stories in this Section

Composite dialogue only after Pakistan’s action
Now SIT can question Modi as High Court rejects plea
Bill Gates against U.S. keeping out talent
Supreme Court directive on bail in Shopian case
Woman stripped on Patna street; Nitish orders probe
My action against judges was legal, says Musharraf
26/11: court sees discrepancies in Jadhav’s statement
Ignored for the Khel Ratna
‘Ask children with cold to keep away from school’
Mob attacks newspaper office in Gulbarga; three seriously injured
CPI and CPI (M) to contest two seats each in the by-elections
Jewellery broker murder case solved
India can be model for rest of the world: Gates
2 Chinese teams break new ground in stem cell research
Kerala Assembly seeks new dam at Mullaperiyar
Parliament session to go on till Aug. 7
Meet explores investment options in State
Central University finalises courses
Azhagiri’s assurance to mill workers
A.P. budget banks on Centre’s aid
Continental Airlines officials summoned
Train time changed on request from Bangladesh
The day Bangalore shook
New envoys
A year after blasts, police plea for special court yet to be met
Satyam scam: U.S. team confers with CBI

Copyright © 2009, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu