![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, Oct 16, 2009 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Andhra Pradesh |
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs |
Andhra Pradesh
IIM rejects application taking refuge under exemption clause, Section 8 (1) (d) of the RTI Act Applicant quotes Jharkhand High Court saying tenders, once awarded, were public documents HYDERABAD: Indian Institutes of Management may have carved out a niche for themselves for imparting the best management skills in the country, but when it comes to parting with information, they seemed to be as reluctant as any staid government office. An RTI enthusiast, Rakesh Kumar Dubbudu, found this the hard way. The IIM, Ahmedabad, has just rejected his application filed under Right to Information Act seeking full information on award of contract to Prometric for conducting the online Common Admission Test for the IIMs. While refusing to provide copies of tender documents, complete file noting and reasons for selecting Prometric over 13 other companies, the IIM, Ahmedabad, took refuge under the exemption clause, Section 8 (1) (d) of the RTI Act. Violation of ActMr. Rakesh argues that invoking this Section was absurd and in blatant violation of the RTI Act as tender documents were public documents once the tender was awarded. “They do not hamper the competitiveness as the process is over. In fact they will actually provide the citizens information to evaluate the system of governance and how they arrive at decisions in finalising contracts.” In support of his argument, he cited the orders passed by the Central Information Commission and the Jharkhand High Court in similar cases. The CIC had held that a “contract with public authority cannot be categorised as ‘confidential’ after completion…. Had it been a case of quotations, bid or tender or any other information prior to conclusion of a contract, it could be categorised as trade secret, but once concluded the confidentiality of such transactions cannot be claimed….” The Jharkhand High Court Bench, in its judgment said: “prima facie, we are of the view that once a decision is taken in the matter of grant of tender, there is no justification to keep it secret. People have a right to know the basis on which the decision has been taken … tender documents cannot be kept secret, that too, after tender is decided and work order is issued.... If the authorities refuse to disclose, the very purpose of the Act will be frustrated…” Complaint filedDisappointed with the response from the premier institute, Mr. Rakesh has filed a complaint with the Central Information Commission besides the First Appeal. “The elite institutes cannot behave in a way that is detrimental to the spirit of RTI. The contract, after all, involves huge public money”.
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Ergo | Home |
Copyright © 2009, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|