Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Wednesday, Dec 09, 2009
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version
Google



New Delhi
News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

New Delhi Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Supreme Court seeks amicus curiae’s response to plea on SIT

Legal Correspondent

Bench expresses displeasure at activist’s allegation


Reopening investigation at this juncture not possible: Justice Jain

High Court proceedings in Ishrat case stayed


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court, even while seeking the response of amicus curiae Harish Salve to the plea for reconstitution of the Special Investigation Team probing some Gujarat riot cases, has expressed its displeasure at the allegation by an activist that the “SIT has been befooling courts.

”Justice D.K. Jain, heading a three-judge Bench told counsel: “Such allegations are not acceptable. This has to be expunged from the application, otherwise it would mean we are being fooled by the SIT.”Even as the Bench, which included Justices P. Sathasivam and Aftab Alam, was perusing the progress report sent by the SIT, senior counsel Aspi Chenoy, appearing for Devendrabhai N. Pathak, said there were lapses in the investigations and pleaded for its reconstitution. Justice Jain told counsel: “Reopening of the investigation at this juncture is not possible. So far as these nine cases are concerned, the entire investigation has been done by the SIT. It was never pointed out earlier that investigation was not done properly.”

Senior counsel Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Gujarat, urged the court not to entertain the application as it contained a scandalous allegation. When Justice Jain expressed his displeasure, Mr. Chenoy apologised to the court for the language used in the application and said he would delete the objectionable portions.The Bench said it would examine the application in January after receiving the amicus curiae’s response.

The Bench said that from the SIT’s report it appeared that in all seven complaints received by it of threat perception to and intimidation of witnesses and victims, adequate steps had been taken for their protection, both at their residences and on court premises. .”

Meanwhile, another Bench comprising Justices B. Sudershan Reddy and G.S. Singhvi extended till January next the stay of all proceedings in the Gujarat High Court in the case of the alleged fake encounter killing of Ishrat Jahan.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



New Delhi

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


News Update



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Ergo | Home |

Copyright 2009, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu