![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, Jan 28, 2010 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Andhra Pradesh |
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
Andhra Pradesh
-
Hyderabad
Mandatory requirement for couples to notify the list of gifts exchanged during wedding draws flak Failure to notify gifts can draw penalty, including a 3-year jail for bride, groom and parents too HYDERABAD: All India Forgotten Women’s Association (AIFWA), together with the Andhra Pradesh Mothers-in-law Protection Association (APMPA) and Save Indian Family Foundation (SIFF) vehemently opposed the proposed amendments to the Dowry Prohibition Act and said they will only encourage and legalise dowry. Purpose questionedAddressing a press conference on Wednesday, Uma Challa, representing the AIFWA, along with Anil Kumar and Venu from Save Indian Family Foundation, criticised the provisions proposed under the latest amendments. Drawing attention to the proposed mandatory requirement for couples to notify the list of gifts exchanged during the wedding, failing which could draw heavy penalty including a three-year jail term not only for the bride and the groom, but also for the parents, the All India Forgotten Women’s Association representative sought to question the purpose of such listing, and if the affidavit with a list of gifts was not a way of legalising dowry. Ms. Uma Challa also asked if the affidavit would also notify if no gifts were demanded by the husband and in-laws. No clarityApart from this, the expansion of the term ‘dowry’ to items given before, during and at any time after marriage does not add any clarity to the definition, she said. Inheritance“Does the property earned or inherited by the bride before marriage amount to dowry? Or, if the girl willingly spends on her family after marriage, does it amount to dowry too?” Ms. Uma Challa asked. Reducing punishmentThe All India Forgotten Women’s Association representative also opposed the proposed reduction of punishment for dowry givers, and said no dowry giver has been punished since the enactment in 1961. Men cautionedAll the three organisations issued a word of caution to men intending to get married, and urged them to insist on prenuptial agreements in order to protect themselves from false cases, in view of the proposed amendments awaiting approval of the Cabinet.
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Ergo | Home |
Copyright © 2010, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|