![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| New Delhi |
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
New Delhi
NEW DELHI: The Chief Justice of India, S.H. Kapadia, on Monday made it clear to lawyers and litigants that the Supreme Court would not entertain Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petitions dealing with policy decisions of the government. Heading a three-judge Bench, Justice Kapadia, during the course of hearing of certain PILs, said: “The Supreme court has no power to interfere in policy matters. We will not interfere as there are certain implications. We can't interfere in the governance. The Supreme Court cannot solve all problems like the need for toilets etc. We will not entertain any PIL merely on newspaper reports without going to the authorities and getting their response.” ‘Don't have right' While one petition sought voting rights for Non-Resident Indians (NRIs), another wanted 33 per cent reservation for women. Justice Kapadia said: “We don't have a right to give a direction to Parliament to enact a law. How can we increase women's reservation in Parliament?” The court also rejected a plea seeking a direction for the government to take steps to prevent accidents on roads. In the PIL for NRI voting rights, counsel Amar Dave — appearing for Qatar-based NRI Ahammed Adyottil — submitted that there was a Bill proposed to provide voting rights, but the Bill was not introduced. When counsel said certain other countries permitted voting rights to such persons, Justice Kapadia said: “Our law does not allow this. It is for government to decide by making law to grant right to vote.” The Bench, however, said that since the Representation of the People (Amendment) Bill 2006 was pending with the government, “we will not interfere at this stage.” It permitted the petitioner to withdraw the petition.
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Ergo | Home |
Copyright © 2010, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|