Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Wednesday, Nov 24, 2010
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version
Google



Business
News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

Business Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

SEBI panel suggests tougher rules for new bourses

Rs.1,000-crore net worth for anchor investors advocated


Seeks comments from the public by December 31

Exchanges should be allowed to make only ‘reasonable' profits


MUMBAI: In a move that could make it difficult for corporate entities to set up stock exchanges, a Securities and Exchange Board of India committee on Tuesday recommended that only banks and public financial institutions could be anchor investors in bourses and stopping them from listing or making huge profits.

According to industry sources, the recommendations would make things difficult for FTIL group-founded new bourse MCX-SX, which is allowed to trade only in currency futures, and its plea for trading in equity and other segments has already been rejected by SEBI on non-compliance with shareholding and other norms. SEBI has invited comments from the public by December 31.

The panel suggested a minimum net worth of Rs.100 crore for the stock exchanges and allowing only banks and public financial institutions as the anchor or main investors. These anchor investors would need to be identified in the application itself by any entity seeking permission.

For anchor investors also, the committee has suggested a minimum Rs.1,000 crore net worth.

The committee also suggested disallowing the stock exchanges to list themselves, although it recognised the benefits of listing in terms of providing investors an exit route. But the disclosures and corporate governance requirements of the listing agreement would still be applicable on the bourses.

On profits, the committee suggested that the stock exchanges should be allowed to make only ‘reasonable' profits, although it stopped short of recommending any clear-cut cap on profitability and left it for SEBI to monitor and act against any super-profits that are made.

The high profits of larger bourse NSE has been a subject matter of sharp criticism by the newer entrant MCX-SX. The recommendation of the Bimal Jalan Committee, if accepted, would derail the plans of the country's two premier bourses — the BSE and the NSE — to go public.

“Market infrastructure institutions (MIIs) being public institutions, any downward movement in its share prices may lead to a loss of credibity and this may be detrimental to the market as a whole. Therefore, the Committee is not in favour of permitting listing of MIIs,” said the report.

The Jalan committee, which submitted its proposals after months of deliberations, also said that disclosure and corporate governance norms for market institutions should be the same as that applicable for listed entities.

In case of companies wherein stock exchanges hold 24 per cent or more, that entity would have to seek prior nod of SEBI.

“Further if an entity chooses to get itself listed on a stock exchange and is substantially owned (24 per cent or more of equity capital) by that stock exchange or by an MII in which that stock exchange holds shares, then such entity shall seek prior approval from SEBI before listing,” it said. — PTI

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



Business

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


News Update



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Ergo | Home |

Copyright 2010, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu