![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, Feb 20, 2011 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Front Page |
|
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
Front Page
New Delhi: The former Kerala Minister, R. Balakrishna Pillai, and the former Chairman of the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB), Ramabhadran Nair, sentenced to one-year rigorous imprisonment in the Idamalayar Hydroelectric Power Project case, moved the Supreme Court on Saturday seeking review of the February 10 judgment. A Bench of Justices P. Sathasivam and B.S. Chauhan had allowed a special leave petition filed by Chief Minister V.S. Achuthanandan (who was then Leader of the Opposition) against a Kerala High Court judgment acquitting three, after reversing the trial court verdict. Mr. Pillai filed the appeal since the State did not prefer an appeal against the acquittal. The review petition filed by E.M.S. Anam, advocate for Mr. Pillai, said the seminal question “is whether it would be open to the leader of a political party, to utilise a system for the purpose of prosecuting a leader of the ruling political party at that time for purely political gains.” Further “the core question to be decided by the Supreme Court was whether the Chief Minister of a State was entitled to continue an appeal preferred by him when he was Leader of the Opposition and to take a stand contrary to the stand taken by the State government, which was implicit in the fact that no appeal was preferred for almost two years since the High Court judgment.” The petition asked: “Would he [Mr. Achuthanandan] be having the status of a person interested? Was his interest in the administration of criminal justice or was his interest in putting down a political opponent and thus seeking to win elections based on his prosecuting the case in the Supreme Court?” Serious efforts On legal grounds, the petition said the impugned judgment suffered from very serious errors apparent as “it does not state or specify the provisions or the statutes under which the accused are sentenced. Corrections and Clarifications The report said: Mr. [Balakrishna] Pillai filed the appeal since the State did not prefer an appeal against acquittal. It was Mr. Achuthanandan who filed the appeal.
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Ergo | Home |
Copyright © 2011, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|