Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Saturday, Mar 05, 2011
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version
Google



Andhra Pradesh

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs |

Andhra Pradesh - Hyderabad Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Inter exam: court directive to State

Legal Correspondent

Seeks details of steps being taken


Bench was dealing with writ filed by

S. Chakrapani of

Warangal

Bench wanted response of State and adjourned the case to March 8


HYDERABAD: A Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court comprising Chief Justice Nissar Ahmad Kakru and Justice Vilas Afzulpurkar on Friday directed the State government to inform the court about the steps it had taken to protect the interest of students attending various examinations in Hyderabad on March 10.

The Bench was dealing with a writ petition field by Sambaraju Chakrapani of Warangal who said that future of the students was at stake and the government had to take steps to protect the students in the light of the proposed ‘million march' planned in the city by the Telangana Joint Action Committee and others on March 10.

The Bench wanted the response of the State Government and adjourned the case to March 8.

Dismissed

A Division Bench of comprising Justice G. Raghuram and Justice R. Kantha Rao on Friday dismissed the writ petitions filed by family members of B. Ramalinga Raju, the main accused in Satyam Computers scam challenging the action of the Enforcement Directorate in attaching their properties and the constitutional validity of Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

When the Enforcement Directorate attached the properties of family members of Ramalinga Raju, including his son B. Teja Raju, they filed a writ petition in the High Court. They said that various provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act were arbitrary, unconstitutional and liable to be struck down.

They further contended that as these provisions were unconstitutional the action of the ED against them also fail. The Bench speaking through Justice Raghuram brushed aside the contentions of the petitioners and upheld the constitutional validity of provisions of the Money Laundering Act.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



Andhra Pradesh

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Updates: Breaking News |


News Update



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Ergo | Home |

Copyright © 2011, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu