Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Monday, Apr 11, 2005

About Us
Contact Us
Metro Plus Bangalore
Published on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays & Saturdays

Features: Magazine | Literary Review | Life | Metro Plus | Open Page | Education Plus | Book Review | Business | SciTech | Entertainment | Young World | Property Plus | Quest | Folio |

Metro Plus    Bangalore    Chennai    Coimbatore    Delhi    Hyderabad    Kochi   

Printer Friendly Page Send this Article to a Friend

Not about an Angrez

You'll soon see him in The Rising. Tom Alter has done it all: movies, theatre, journalism. And loves Urdu poetry and Sachin Tendulkar, discovers PRASHANTH G.N.



Tom Alter: `Look at me as an artiste who delivers.' — Photo: Bhagya Prakash K.

TOM ALTER is perceptive, sensitive and versatile. He has not been in the last 30 years a film actor alone, but an author, with three books to his credit, a journalist, an intense theatreperson, a sports enthusiast, and a lover of language. And Gulzar himself vouches for his Urdu. And yet people do this to him: "How can this man speak such good Hindi? How does he act in Hindi films? He is an Englishman." Tom can be warm, but he won't take nonsense. He's also testy about being taken for granted. Excerpts from an interview.

Have you been typecast in your films? The Englishman...

I am tired of answering this question. I have been doing this for 31 years. You should learn to ask a better one. In the 225 films I've done, would you know that in more than half of them I have not played that role? How many have seen all films? Look at me as an artiste who delivers or doesn't. Am I good? Am I not? It's not about an Englishman.

Satyajit Ray, Shyam Benegal and Subash Ghai. Ray is realist; Benegal brings artifice; Ghai a lot more. You fit into all three sensibilities.

I've been comfortable in all these styles. Ray would give me the script six months in advance to get everything right. It was great working with him. But we have to be ready to act even if scripts don't come our way.

Looking back, what films of yours do you like? What roles would you want, today, to go back to?

Charas, my first one; Ray's Shatranj Ke Khiladi; Des Pardes, Parinda, a powerful one; Aashiqi, Sultanat, I enjoyed that; Sardar Patel, Veer Savarkar, Asambhav, for cricket; Dressing Room, Chameli Memsaab, I was the hero in that. I would like to do Musa again. In Parinda. I think I would do it far better now than I did it then. But then there is Keshav Kalsi, Junoon. I've been an underworld don for five-and-a-half years. I'd like to do Kalsi, by far my best role in front of the camera. It brought out great character. Can I do it that way now? Can't say. Some roles, once done, are over with.

Theatre. What's happening now? What theatre would you like — the humanist-universal or the contextual-historical? You've done both.

Right now I am doing 10 productions, nine of them by Indian writers. Originals, not translations. I am doing them in Hindi, English and Urdu. Today's play, When God Says Cheers, is about acceptance of God, a secular God, a God with no religion. Anyone can get to his fold, but we human beings mess it up. Yes, I've done Maulana Azad. I've loved it because at a very difficult time, Maulana being a Muslim, asked what need there was for Pakistan when Muslims already had India. He was not for the two-nation theory. Theatre should tell stories. And the story should not be propaganda.

But don't specific actors perpetrate injustice? Communalism, for instance. What is your understanding of the Modi issue?

Communalism exists in all of us. It is human nature. We need to control that instinct. But I understand colour or community should not make a difference. I am very happy that the U.S. rejected Modi's visa. But I ask would we have the guts to revoke a visa for President Bush who has committed a greater crime in the world?

How has film

industry changed over the last 20-25 years?

I think the film industry is more open now. We talk of themes we never used to particularly in the realm of relationships — affairs, sex and family, then violence and of course, Pakistan. There we've become blunt.

What's been the writer's life in you?

I have written for 16 years. I wrote a weekly column for The Sunday Observer for a very long time. I contributed to Mid-Day, Gentleman and Debonair. And I wrote extensively for Sporstweek. My latest book, The Longest Race is coming out soon from Penguin.

How do you like cricket today? And Sachin?

There's too much of one-day cricket. There should be more Test cricket. But it's the money, I guess. Sachin? I've known him from 15, from the nets days in Bombay where I happened to do my first interview with him while making a film late 1988. And after that long innings with Kambli, he dismissed my question by saying `che!' when I asked him if he was tired. At 15, he said he liked the ball coming on to the bat. Not one bit scared. He's an attacking bat. He loves Vivian Richards you see.

When we criticise him today, we should realise he has played first class cricket since 15, non-stop Test and one-day cricket for 15 years and that he is 31 now, when it seems like he has a body that is 41. That's the amount of cricket he has played. He played attacking cricket in 1999. He has a few good knocks in him. But he won't play like in '99 ever again. He is slowing down.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Metro Plus    Bangalore    Chennai    Coimbatore    Delhi    Hyderabad    Kochi   

Features: Magazine | Literary Review | Life | Metro Plus | Open Page | Education Plus | Book Review | Business | SciTech | Entertainment | Young World | Property Plus | Quest | Folio |


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Comments to : thehindu@vsnl.com   Copyright © 2005, The Hindu
Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu