Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Saturday, Aug 19, 2006
Google



Metro Plus Kochi
Published on Mondays & Thursdays

Features: Magazine | Literary Review | Life | Metro Plus | Open Page | Education Plus | Book Review | Business | SciTech | Friday Review | Young World | Property Plus | Quest | Folio |

Metro Plus    Bangalore    Chennai    Coimbatore    Delhi    Hyderabad    Kochi    Madurai    Mangalore    Pondicherry    Tiruchirapalli    Thiruvananthapuram    Vijayawada    Visakhapatnam   

Printer Friendly Page Send this Article to a Friend

A question of sweetness

Who doesn't like a sweet if it goes without guilt?



GUILT FREE Sweet substitute

Artificial sweeteners are a modern miracle, but most people approach them with the trepidation they ought to reserve for real sugar. After all, artificial sweeteners provide sweetness without calories, and they do not flood one's teeth with corrosive juices. Perhaps it is the guilt factor: we do not feel comfortable enjoying sweetness without having to pay a price for it. There are also unanswered questions about these products.

Only five artificial sweeteners are approved for human consumption. They are aspartame, saccharin, Acesulfame-K, Neotame and Sucralose. Each has been the subject of rumours and research. Here is the latest on all of them:

Aspartame - This is the stuff present in diet colas and most non-saccharin artificial sweeteners available on the market. It is 200 times sweeter than sugar. Essentially calorie-free when you consider the quantities consumed. A detailed review of more than 100 clinical studies of aspartame shows that it is safe for human consumption. However, people with the rare genetic disorder, phenylketonuria, should avoid aspartame.

Saccharin - First discovered in 1879, and is probably the most controversial. In the 1970s, studies linked saccharin with bladder cancer in rats, and a ban on human consumption appeared imminent. Saccharin was sold with a mandatory label saying it was a potential cancer-causing agent.

Acesulfame-K is more than 200 times sweeter than sugar, and more than 90 studies have proved its safety.

Neotame is up to 13,000 times sweeter than sugar, and it is structurally similar to aspartame - which raised some concerns about safety in phenylketonurics. Sucralose is made from sucrose-common table sugar. However, it is not digested by the body. Sucralose is 600 times sweeter than table sugar, and studies show that it is safe for humans .

RAJEEV M.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



Metro Plus    Bangalore    Chennai    Coimbatore    Delhi    Hyderabad    Kochi    Madurai    Mangalore    Pondicherry    Tiruchirapalli    Thiruvananthapuram    Vijayawada    Visakhapatnam   

Features: Magazine | Literary Review | Life | Metro Plus | Open Page | Education Plus | Book Review | Business | SciTech | Friday Review | Young World | Property Plus | Quest | Folio |


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Comments to : thehindu@vsnl.com   Copyright © 2006, The Hindu
Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu