Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Saturday, Jul 04, 2009
Google



Property Plus Bangalore
Published on Saturdays

Features: Magazine | Literary Review | Life | Metro Plus | Open Page | Education Plus | Book Review | Business | SciTech | NXg | Friday Review | Cinema Plus | Young World | Property Plus | Quest |

Property Plus    Bangalore    Chennai    Hyderabad    Kochi    Malabar    Thiruvananthapuram   

Printer Friendly Page Send this Article to a Friend

KNOW YOUR DEALS

Just not enough

R. BALAJI

Can you live in a 200 sq.ft. Nano house?

After the launch of the Nano car, it seems to be time now for a Nano house. Before assessing its viability, we must understand what a Nano house entails. The area assigned for each unit under this proposal is about 200 sq.ft. This raises the issue of a minimum space required by a family to live comfortably.

A Nano house may be a suitable option for economically weaker sections, or even specific segments such as the elderly or for single occupancy. But the middle and lower middle class families targeted here have a certain lifestyle that requires a minimum level of space to make the dwelling liveable.

A 200 sq.ft. unit will be highly constrained for space, disallowing even simple elements like a large wardrobe. Personal space, especially if it is a family of four, will be a casualty.

It can be argued that cities such as Tokyo manage with small spaces. But the differences in lifestyles as well as availability of technology have to be kept in mind. It is true cities such as Mumbai manage with small dwellings because of paucity of space. Yet, even here, the minimum size of a liveable dwelling is taken to be 300 to 400 sq.ft.

It is important to keep in mind the liveability factor before addressing affordability. While the concept may sound exciting from the price perspective as well as the opportunity to own a dwelling, the actual experience of living in such a place may be a far cry from that expected.

One way of making it liveable to a reasonable degree would be to design the unit in a way that proves to be most efficient, especially if aided with the latest technology and gadgets. However, whether such technology and gadgets would fit into the small budget is debatable.

A more practical solution would be to target such units at specific segments. Otherwise, increasing the size to a more practical level would be the best option so as to ensure the interest so far evinced is not temporary but long standing, which would in turn prove to be a sound solution to address shortage in housing.

(The author is CEO, Propmart, an end-to-end property solutions provider)

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



Property Plus    Bangalore    Chennai    Hyderabad    Kochi    Malabar    Thiruvananthapuram   

Features: Magazine | Literary Review | Life | Metro Plus | Open Page | Education Plus | Book Review | Business | SciTech | NXg | Friday Review | Cinema Plus | Young World | Property Plus | Quest |


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Comments to : thehindu@vsnl.com   Copyright © 2009, The Hindu
Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu