|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, March 19, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Preserve of the affluent
M. Prabha deserves full marks for having tried to explode the
hype that surrounds Indian Writing in English. But there appear
to be a few pitfalls in her revealing statements, says SHANTHA
BHALLA.
THE first thing that attracts one to the book is its title - The
Waffle Of The Toffs - sounds almost musical. On going through it,
one realises, however, that the author meant it to be anything
but musical.
Written almost in a hectoring tone, she sounds like a crusader -
the sworn mission being to burst the bubble of all the hype
around present day Indian Writing in English.
The hypothesis that the writer propounds in the course of the
book, and goes overboard to prove, is that "the sociological
milieu a writer comes from is almost inversely related to his
quality of writing. That is, the more affluent a writer, the less
significant his writing. And the less affluent a writer, the more
significant his writing". This theory is then used as a tool to
debunk the body of present day Indian Writing in English and to
dub it as sub-standard.
This is how the argument goes: All present day Indian writers
writing in English come from affluent, well-connected and
influential families, which, as in the hypothesis propounded
above, makes all their writing essentially insignificant. All the
male novelists who count are the products of places like Doon
School, St. Stephen's College, Oxford and Cambridge.
The female novelists are either the wives and daughters of
influential bureaucrats or they have all married rich husbands -
some of them even marrying foreigners, allowing them to
globetrot. All these modern day writers are highly westernised -
half of them being expatriate Indians.
Their sybaritic backgrounds ensure that all these writers get
glorious reviews not only in the local media but also in the
Western press. All the major awards that come in the way are
totally manipulated and managed, the PR work of this breed of
writers being par excellence and the media, bureaucracy and the
upper-class elite of the society operating like a cartel,
doggedly watching each other's interests.
There is more in the same vein: The works these authors turn out
have been written with a Western audience and the media in mind.
The settings are more often than not foreign locales and the
protagonists are all high flying jet-setting individuals whose
worlds are at total variance with the worlds that lessor mortals
like you and me inhabit.
In Circle Of Reason, by Amitav Ghosh, one moves "between Calcutta
and Lalpukar and then on to Mahe, Al Ghazira, Algeria and
Sahara". In The Shadow Lines, "the story meanders between
Calcutta, Delhi, London, Dhaka, Africa and Sri Lanka ...". In The
Golden Gate, which has California as its setting, "The poet may
be successful at approximating the American idiom" but in the
Indian context, such works are utterly insignificant and
irrelevant for the Indian masses.
Be that as it may, however, for these authors, driven as they are
by the twin agents of "lucre and fame", India becomes significant
"as a market for their foreign-manufactured product", which has
no acceptability in their chosen countries. India figures in
these works only as a saleable commodity because "India is a
fashionable topic the market always seems to want". India-baiting
is what the foreign publishers look for.
Amid all the euphoria over these writers doing a great job, quite
a few of them have crashed out after one book. The author
deserves full marks for having the courage to explode the myth of
Indian Writing in English. She has done a great deal of research.
No statement is made without concrete evidence, some of which are
revealing. Like the one about Sir Sobha Singh (Khushwant Singh's
father) giving testimony against Bhagat Singh and B. K. Dutt in
the bombing case.
However, there appear to be a few pitfalls in an otherwise
considerable work. Her theory may do well in the context of the
area she has chosen for her study. But trying to explain the
entire gamut of literature in this fashion is taking a very
simplistic view of a complex subject. At times, the author in her
zeal, fails to be objective. The bureaucrats who have taken to
writing may be misappropriating both their time at work and their
positiotion. But to conclude that bureaucrats (or for that matter
anybody doing any other job) should just confine themselves to
their cabins and never try to venture out on any kind of creative
activity because they hold public office in a poor country, is
perhaps taking the argument too far.
The Waffle Of The Toffs, M. Prabha, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.
Pvt. Ltd., Rs. 250.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Varied styles and themes Next : To Calcutta with love | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|