|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, July 27, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Other States
| Previous
| Next
Lt. Governor refuses to order demolition
By Our Staff Reporter
NEW DELHI, JULY 27.
Despite the Delhi High Court refusal to consider the breach of
public peace plea earlier, Delhi's Lieutenant-Governor, Mr. Vijai
Kapoor, has again reiterated it as the reason for not going ahead
with the demolition of unauthorised structures around Jama Masjid
here.
The DDA had approached Mr. Kapoor seeking his permission for
removal of illegal constructions and encroachments in and around
the Jama Masjid as per the Delhi High Court directive of November
28 and February 28. The High Court had, on July 10, summoned the
DDA Vice-Chairman, Mr. P. K. Hota, to appear before it on August
10. He has been asked to explain why contempt proceedings should
not be initiated against him for not complying with its previous
two orders in this regard.
Insiders at Raj Niwas and DDA said Mr. Kapoor, who also is the
DDA Chairman, in a halfpage note, is understood to have justified
his decision, stating that any attempt to demolish illegal
structures and encroachments from the Jama Masjid area would
create a major law and order problem resulting in the situation
getting out of control.
Mr. Kapoor is understood to have argued that this was a volatile
and sensitive issue and he, being head of Delhi Police, could not
risk creating a chaotic situation, particularly at a time when
Parliament is in session. It is better to wait for the report of
the Delhi Government appointed committee to suggest and recommend
the area development plan of the Jama Masjid, he is learnt to
have argued.
After refusal from Mr. Kapoor, the DDA is now likely to plead
before the High Court that it was not given ``clearance'' for
encroachment removal by the Lieutenant-Governor.
As per the latest directive from the Union Urban Development
Minister, Mr. Jagmohan, this affidavit will be shown to him, and
it is unlikely that he will toe the line being pursued by the
DDA, sources said. The July 10 directive of the High Court was
taken seriously by Mr. Jagmohan, following which he had asked the
DDA to submit a report as to why the order was not implemented.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Other States Previous : ''Talk of the town'' Next : Govt. housing project inaugurated | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|